Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +22%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy