Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +81%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
1280
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU116
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy