Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +17%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU116
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy