Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD FirePro W7000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +28%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
12
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 24
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy