Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100 +36%
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960
2.413 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1127 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.70 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.39 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.413 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GM206
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
GM206-300-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy