CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
VS
AMD FirePro W7100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 TiM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
+403%
16.6 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100
VS
GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
46
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
5888
112
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
135.4 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.4 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.60 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.60 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Tonga
GPU Name
GA104
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
2
AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
3
AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
4
AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
5
AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
6
AMD FirePro W7100 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
7
AMD FirePro W7100 vs ATI Radeon HD 4580
8
AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
9
AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
10
AMD FirePro W7100 vs MTT S10
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy