Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100 +8353%
3.297 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GT218
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy