Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6300M +5%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 24
Amethyst XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy