AMD FirePro W7170M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+1004%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
2048
Shading Units
9728
128
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
AD103
Amethyst XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
