Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs Intel Arc A750

AMD FirePro W8000 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +433%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-512
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy