Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +7068%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
33W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT218
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy