Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 +55%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1792
Shading Units
1408
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
120W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU116
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy