Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +355%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy