Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (195W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
195W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK104
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy