Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +53%
3.226 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1344
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK104
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy