Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600 +519%
19.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
130W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 33
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy