CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
VS
AMD FirePro W8000
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Vega Frontier Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
+306%
13.11 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
VS
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1382 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
64
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
409.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.21 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.11 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
819.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Vega 10
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX AIR
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD FirePro W8000
2
AMD Radeon HD 6970 vs AMD FirePro W8000
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs AMD FirePro W8000
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs AMD FirePro W8000
5
AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs AMD FirePro W8000
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD FirePro W8000
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB vs AMD FirePro W8000
8
AMD FirePro W8000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
9
AMD FirePro W8000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750
10
AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy