Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +238%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy