Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD FirePro W8000 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (190W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +1%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
28
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tonga
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
190W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy