Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +2722%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
1792
Shading Units
18176
112
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
AD102
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy