Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs Intel Arc A350

AMD FirePro W8100 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +37%
4.219 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-128
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy