Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (125W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +19%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2560
Shading Units
1408
160
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
125W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU116
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy