Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (170W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +234%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
1.263 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Mar 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.17 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.67 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1263 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
170W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GF114
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy