Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +2604%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
48
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
G94B
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

220W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy