Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +4%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
2560
Shading Units
1280
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU116
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy