Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +687%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2560
Shading Units
216
160
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT200
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy