Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +495%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Dec 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
240
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
204W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT200B
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy