CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
VS
AMD FirePro W8100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (170W vs 220W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
+234%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
1.263 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100
VS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Graphics Card
Jun 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.17 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.67 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1263 GFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
GF114
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Board Design
220W
TDP
170W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs AMD FirePro W8100
2
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8100
3
AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500
4
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
5
AMD Radeon RX 470 vs AMD FirePro W8100
6
AMD FirePro W8100 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP
7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
8
AMD FirePro W8100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 PRO
9
AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
10
AMD FirePro W8100 vs ATI Radeon HD 5730
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy