Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (134W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +166%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1.585 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
134W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GK106
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy