Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +131%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GM206
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy