Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (220W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 +1857%
82.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Sep 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
128
2560
Shading Units
16384
160
TMUs
512
64
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
450W
550 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
AD102
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy