Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (220W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +1836%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Oct 2024
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
19456
160
TMUs
1216
64
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
750W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
153 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy