Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +94%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Fiji
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy