Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA A2

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 200.1GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (60W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
A2 +13%
4.531 TFLOPS
VS
A2

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA107
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy