Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon 550X 640SP

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon 550X 640SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon 550X 640SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 550X 640SP 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1071MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +191%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon 550X 640SP
1.371 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2018
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1019 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1071 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.14 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1371 GFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1371 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Lexa
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy