Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe +836%
37.42 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
84
2048
Shading Units
10752
128
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA102
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy