Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Arc A380

AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Arc A380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Arc A380 +5%
4.198 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy