Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Arc A580

AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Arc A580

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 8GB VRAM Arc A580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Arc A580 +207%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1700 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-512
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy