Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +177%
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
2048
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU102
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy