Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +26%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
44
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy