Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +4194%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
32
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G84
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy