Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 330W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock2435MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XTX +524%
24.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2435 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
311.7 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
779.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.87 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.93 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.558 TFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
330W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTXH (215-121000247)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy