Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +1564%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
2048
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92B
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy