Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +36%
5.437 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.96 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
169.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.87 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.437 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
169.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU116
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
TU116-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy