Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +327%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4750
0.934 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2009
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.68 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
934.4 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
186.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV740
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
RV740 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy