Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +14%
3.994 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy