Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5670 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5670 's Advantages
Lower TDP (64W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +544%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5670
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2010
FirePro
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
400
128
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
64W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Redwood
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Redwood XT (215-0757002)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy