Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +62%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2016
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1125 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Baffin
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy