Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +105%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Fiji
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy