Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (263W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7800 XT +834%
37.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
3840
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
583.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
74.65 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.32 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1166 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
263W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 32
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 32 XT (215-180000006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy